I find it endlessly frustrating how the vast majority of people, including politicians, journalists, activists and pretty much everybody else, is rooting for something to be done about CO2 emissions and the climate change it's causing, yet pretty much all the solutions they are proposing are absolutely idiotic, from paper straws to proposals to limiting car driving, to hindering the industry and the economy.
Do you know what's the major source of human-produced CO2? It's not cars. It's not even the industry. It's this:
That is what should be fixed. My proposal to fix it? Change it to this:
Even if just that "coal" part were to be replaced with nuclear, that would be enormously better than stupid paper straws.
Do you know what's the major source of human-produced CO2? It's not cars. It's not even the industry. It's this:
That is what should be fixed. My proposal to fix it? Change it to this:
Even if just that "coal" part were to be replaced with nuclear, that would be enormously better than stupid paper straws.
The problem is that the climate change activists are anti-nuclear, even though it's the only power source with any prospect of achieving carbon-neutrality.
ReplyDeleteThey may hate it even more than fossil fuels; and unfortunately, the politicians listen to them. I mean look at Germany post-Fukushima.
I've come to the conclusion that nothing would satisfy them short of returning the world to the Stone Age.
The big irony is that all this current nonsensical climate activism is actually going to cause emissions to increase, not decrease. Emissions are not going to go down. Because they are concentrating on the wrong things, that's only going to backfire.
Delete