Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from June, 2012

Rational thinking is not natural

"Rational thinking is not natural" may seem like quite an odd and stupid title, but let me explain. (No, it's not an attack on rational thinking. Again, please let me explain.) Irrationality, superstition and anti-scientific sentiments seem to be on the raise (again) in later years. The irrational has always fascinated people for the entire history of humanity. There has always been (and unfortunately there probably will always be) a very significant portion of humanity that wants to believe in all kinds of superstition, bypassing all rational thinking. However, irrational thinking has experienced a huge boost recently. Not only is young-earth creationism and anti-evolutionism on the raise, but a general anti-science mentality among other groups as well (such as many nature activists). To these people, somehow, the very idea of requiring actual observation, measurements and testing before believing something seems silly and limited. Not only is rational thinking disca

Cult mentality in the era of the internet

One of the key techniques that cults, and even many more open religions, use to keep their followers is to discourage, if not even outright forbid, communication with the "opposition". If your intention is to keep a flock of followers who agree with your views, this technique makes sense and is pretty effective. If your followers never communicate with people with differing views and never hear and have to think about criticism of their own views, and are never exposed to alternatives, that's an effective way to keep people believing in your views. Sometimes some of the people, even when isolated from alternative views and criticism, will start thinking about it on their own and doubting the veracity of the views they have been believing. However, this is relatively rare (and usually other techniques are used to discourage, mitigate and outright destroy such doubts.) But this post is not about religion. It just served as an introduction. What I find curious is that