Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from June, 2021

"Anti-racist" social justice warriors are completely insane

I shouldn't even have to remind that Abraham Lincoln was the President of the United States that not only fought for the constitutional amendments that abolished slavery in the United States to pass and gave citizenship to all former slaves, but who moreover fought the deadliest war in the United States history to end slavery. He spoke and rallied against slavery many, many times during his career, before and after becoming President, and fought tooth and nail to abolish it and make it illegal, and to free the slaves. He forced via military force the states that didn't want to end slavery to do so. Black people should consider Abraham Lincoln a hero and a savior, and a reminder that black people do belong there. Instead, we get things like the above, because social justice erodes the human brain and makes people completely idiotic drooling retards. I have zero respect for those people. Zero. They are morons and retards and they can rot in the deepest pits of hell for all I ca

The change of meaning of "white supremacy"

If there's one thing that the regressive leftist social justice ideology loves, it's to take existing words with very negative connotations, and change their meaning and start using these words with this new meaning, while still carrying (and taking advantage of) the original negative connotations. This is almost always used in a very deceptive way, to make something sound significantly worse than it really is. Perhaps one of the most prominent and notorious recent examples of this is the hijacking of the term "white supremacy", and doing exactly the above. I kid you not, when the social justice ideologues use the term "white supremacy", what they really mean is "white privilege". They are essentially synonyms. When "intersectional feminist" academics use the term, they are literally using it as a synonym for that other favorite made-up term of theirs, ie "white privilege". They indeed are using "white supremacy" to me

The American judiciary system is corrupt

The judiciary branch of the United States government is supposed to be one of the three main independent branches of government, a part of the "checks and balances" system, one of whose tasks is to supervise the other branches so that they stay within the law. The role of the judiciary branch is absolutely crucial and critical. If the judiciary branch becomes corrupted and partisan, it's a fast way to disaster. And as I have commented several times before in this blog, it appears that the judiciary branch of the United States has indeed become corrupted. After the 2020 presidential election, Donald Trump and his administration, several states, as well as several members of Congress, formally filed a lawsuit against several other states for voting irregularities. The Federal Court quickly dismissed those lawsuits without any consideration. In other words, the Federal court refused to even investigate the matter, refused to see or hear any evidence or testimonies, and refus

Crunchyroll made an inappropriate tweet... and I don't get it

Crunchyroll, one of the biggest and most famous publishers and translators of Japanese anime in the west, recently came under a lot of heat from the woke left because of a tweet they posted: They quickly had to remove the tweet and post an apology: The thing is... I honestly cannot understand what's so insensitive and inappropriate about the original tweet. It was a translation of something written in Japanese... and it was somehow so insensitive that they got a huge amount of backlash. Which part of it, exactly, is insensitive? Is someone "becoming a dark-skinned gal" insensitive and inappropriate? This is a fictional cartoon. Is the cartoon itself inappropriate because someone in it "became a dark-skinned gal"? Why is that inappropriate? Is it inappropriate for Crunchyroll to say that? Why? Or is, perhaps the inappropriate thing the possible implication that dark-skinned girls are promiscuous? I thought that the far-left was not only A-ok with promiscuity (

The racism of the far left has to stop

The zealotry, bigotry, fundamentalism, extremist attitudes, sexism and outright blatant racism of the far left in the western world, especially in the United States, has been escalating and escalating at an ever-increasing rate with no end in sight. And the problem is that they are getting away with their ever-more-blatant racism more and more, at a larger and larger scale, with little to no repercussions. Think of the extraordinarily extreme racist attitudes in the United States in the first half of the 1900's. Think of the worst and most egregious examples that you can think of. Of the attitudes, the rhetoric, the prevailing ideology and ideas among the most racist people who ever lived in the country. As incredible as it sounds, the racism and racist rhetoric of the current far left has reached and sometimes even surpassed that. There seems to be no limit to how far they are willing to go, and how overtly blatant they are willing to be about it. By this point, almost not a singl

Captain Disillusion's social justice history goes farther back

In December of 2017 I wrote a blog post where I lamented my disappointment that the popular youtuber who goes by the nickname Captain Disillusion, and who I was quite a fan of, turned out to apparently be a social justice warrior, because of a speech he gave at Skepticon Australia 2017 (and later reaffirmed by another speech he gave at the Blender Conference of 2018 ). Or, more precisely, I lamented the fact that he seemed to have broken a life-long stance of neutrality, staying out of politics in his videos and only concentrating on what he's good at (ie. creating interesting videos about video hoaxes and modern urban legends). I don't really care what the political opinions of people are (regardless of which corner of the political spectrum they fall on), as long as they keep those opinions out of their non-political youtube channels. (Yes, even if someone holds political opinions I 100% agree with, I don't really want them marring videos and channels that are not relate

The scary thing about SJW tactics is that they work even on anti-SJWs

I have written many, many times before about how the fight against the extreme social justice left seems to be a completely lost cause because their opposition, the anti-SJWs, cannot organize, are too weak, and give up way too easily, while the SJWs are too organized, too methodical, have the larger numbers, and never, ever give up. (Latest blog post on this subject here .) In later years I have also notice another rather worrying trend among anti-SJWs, even the most vocal and dedicated ones. The ones who are constantly eg. making videos criticizing the latest craziness of the "woke left", and speak the loudest against it. And this trend is that of succumbing to the compelled speech demands that the far left has been pushing for many years now. This is not the case with every single big-name anti-SJW, but it seems to be the case with many of them. In other words, more and more of these people have started using the new speech codes of the far left, the new vocabulary, the new

Biden is too senile to even hide he's just a puppet

Many people, including myself several times in this blog, predicted that if Biden became the President of the United States, he would just be a puppet of his staff, of the people behind the scenes. It became amply clear during his presidential campaign that he's suffering from old age and his mental faculties are not what they used to be. He's borderline senile. Many, many times during his campaign, and after he became the president, he showed clear signs of this, such as forgetting where he is, forgetting people's names, even using the wrong names (of people and places), stopping in the middle of long sentences and then rambling about something else, as if he just forgot what he was trying to say, and so on and so forth. Likewise he seems too senile to realize when something is too questionable or inappropriate to say, in other words blurting out the first thing that comes to his mind, which might sound witty in his mind but turns out to be horribly inappropriate (such as

The irony of "pride month" parades

"Pride month" is supposed to be about increasing acceptance of homosexuals (and, rather obviously, in later years all the SJW yada-yada buzzwords). They exist, they are normal people just like you and me, they should be accepted and treated like everybody else. Yet, what do you see when you watch a "pride parade"? Do you see normal everyday people, just like everybody else? Do you see people who you would think of as "yeah, just a regular guy or gal, just like everybody else, looks like a normal wholesome person who I wouldn't mind having a beer with and be my friend"? Or do you see extreme deviants? Do you see debauchery and extreme hedonism? Behavior that's absolutely not how normal average people behave? Why all the public debauchery? Why all the hedonism? Why all the obnoxious public displays of deviant behavior? Why the exhibitionism? That's not how normal people behave. Are we supposed to think of these people as normal everyday people,

The "just wait until the storm passes" tactic of the far left

I have written in past blog posts how fighting the far left may be a lost cause because the critics are, in good and unfortunately in bad, too much of independent critical free thinkers who are hard to organize and, most particularly, give up too easily when a campaign to have something done doesn't seem to be going anywhere. The thing is, many people in governments, companies, organizations, institutions and activist groups know this. They know that if the opposition makes a huge deal about yet another controversial issue, the only thing that they need to do is to play the waiting game: Just wait. Don't do anything. Wait for long enough, and the critics will give up, forget about it, and move on. Because that's exactly what happens with the anti-SJW critics, and even the political right eg. in the United States, the conservatives. Eventually they just give up. They implicitly surrender. Quite critically, this tactic works even when it's an actual extremely serious is

Pre-Columbian America was not an Utopia

In a previous blog post I wrote about how the modern social justice ideology engages in heavy-handed historical revisionism when it comes to historic slavery. If you were to believe what the most outlandish claims of social justice warriors are with regards to slavery, in the distant past native non-white civilizations were pretty much a paradise, an Utopia, where native people lived in peace and harmony with nature and each other, and things like slavery were a completely unknown concept. Up until, of course, the evil white people came to conquer, destroy, kill, pillage, rob, steal and, of course, take slaves. If any non-white peoples in the past ever engaged in slavery it was only because they learned the practice from white people (who 100% invented it, and absolutely nobody had come up with the idea before), and even then they engaged in it solely to sell the slaves to white people. There's a somewhat similar notion of the pre-Columbian native people of North America (ie. the