In many western countries, most prominently the United States and Canada, more and more parents have been deluded into the "trans" ideology and believing that their young children should be "transitioned" to the opposite sex if they show even the slightest symptoms.
It should be extremely obvious that young children do not understand these things and cannot make rational life-long life-changing decisions on these matters that they don't know anything about, and that in the vast, vast majority of cases any "confusion" that children may have about themselves (assuming they even have such "confusion") will clear up when they grow up and start understanding things better.
However, even if for a moment we entertained the idea that "transitioning" children to the opposite sex were a valid and rational thing to do, one would think that such a radical life-altering and eventually possibly irreversible body-altering and body-crippling decisions wouldn't be taken lightly. The decision to "help" and "support" a child "transitioning" to the opposite sex should be based on years of observation, consideration, psychological analysis, and experience. A consistent pattern of behavior should be observed for many years, and the understanding that the child has on these things should be evaluated impartially and without any sort of coaxing or manipulation (deliberate or inadvertent), taking into account that children are very impressionable and tend to want to do things that give them positive feedback from others, especially parents.
Yet, time and again we see even in mainstream media examples of parents rushing to "transition" their children for the slightest of reasons, with little to no consideration and using the flimsiest and most illogical of excuses.
In a rather infamous segment broadcasted by, of all possible news networks, Fox News (something that it has been admonished to no end by its viewers), the parents of a girl tell how their daughter is now their "son", and how they are helping "him" transition.
What was their stated reasoning and justification for this? Were they based this on years and years of observation, analysis and experience, and a boatload of evidence? Had they been observing her behavior for like five years and seen a very consistent and clear pattern?
No, the stated reason, the only stated reason, for them to make that decision was that when she was like 2 or 3 years old she didn't like wearing dresses.
That's it. That's the sole reason they give in the segment of why their daughter is now their "son". She didn't like wearing dresses when she was 2 or 3. No other reason.
Any sane rational parent would just dismiss such an inconsequential thing as nothing. So, their 2-year-old daughter doesn't at this point in her life like wearing dresses? Yeah, so? She may be having a phase and she will eventually start liking them when she gets a bit older. Or maybe she's a bit tomboyish (at least this point). There's nothing wrong in girls wearing more stereotypically boyish clothes. Girls of all ages do that all the time, and have done that since forever.
But no, they immediately jumped to the conclusion that she's actually a "boy", because she didn't like wearing dresses. No other reason. And that they now have to brainwash her to artificially fulfill this prediction.
I despair for the next generation. Society is producing a generation of crippled castrated mentally broken brainwashed people whose lives and bodies will for the most part be irreversibly ruined, and this for the stupidest reasons possible.
Comments
Post a Comment