Skip to main content

Posts

Päivi Räsänen is the victim of a political witch hunt in Finland

Päivi Räsänen is a Finnish politician who infamously recently got convicted for "incitement against a group of people" because she is a practicing Christian and she made public comments about homosexuality that are in accordance to conservative Christian beliefs. When I say that she is the victim of a political witch hunt, I'm being 100% serious. I'm not throwing that term lightly, I'm not blowing things out of proportion, I'm not exaggerating. This is because of the process how the conviction came to be. Firstly, after she had made those public comments, a complaint was made to the Finnish police about it. The police made the decision that what she said is fully within her right to free speech and that there is no reason to suspect any criminality, and thus they didn't even start a preliminary investigation (which is the first official step that the police performs when investigating a crime and deciding whether to prosecute.) However, the Prosecutor Gene...

What explains the IQ results of sub-Saharan Africans?

The YouTube channel BantuCityDiaries, who I have mentioned before in another blog post , recently did something that has been  de facto  taboo and verboten in most of the rest of the world, particularly the western world: He want ahead and performed an IQ test in Nigeria to see if older reports on it are actually accurate or not. Turned out that his results match those old reports quite well, and it appears, according to this experiment, that at least in Nigeria the average IQ is extremely low (somewhere around 73, give or take.) Of course in the west this is a taboo subject and such studies must never be conducted and the results and the subject overall must never be discussed, and any results must be categorically denied, excused and rationalized, and cannot be taken at face value. If we approach these results without any prejudice, without any judgment, without any preconceptions, without jumping to any questionable conclusions, just taking them as they are, in a completel...

A sixth type of First Amendment auditor

Earlier I wrote a blog post about " five types of First Amendment auditors ". The first type I listed is the best kind of such auditor: They are always polite and respectful, always try to de-escalate, know and respect all the relevant laws, and never actively confront nor make contact with other people unprompted, and they show respect for government officials and people in general if they likewise show respect for them. The second type I listed is a kind that I don't like very much: They also know the relevant laws and for the most part respect them, but they are always extremely rude and confrontational, provoking people, throwing insults and cursewords, and being extremely disrespectful even when eg. the cops act completely professionally, respectfully and correctly (and don't even do so much as asking for ID). There is, however, a type of First Amendment auditor that sits somewhere in between those two extremes, which can also be considered its own "auditor ...

YouTube really needs to do something about AI slop, and quickly

Some time ago YouTube officially embraced the raise of AI-generated videos. Their official stance was that AI allows people to express themselves and their ideas in video form, something that was previously exclusive only to people with the time, equipment, talent and knowledge on how to create such videos (often a very arduous process that can take days or even weeks of intense work). AI has opened up this possibility for everybody, so anybody can put their ideas and expression in video form without it being exclusive to the few. Yet, to the surprise of nobody, that's not how the vast, vast majority of people are using AI-generated videos. Completely unsurprisingly, well over 90% of all AI-generated videos I have seen on YouTube has been created for the purpose of deception. Fake stories, fake events, fake outrage, trying to be passed as real just for the clicks, with the video authors going their way to try to hide that it's an AI-generated video, a complete fabrication. Only...

Perhaps Thunderf00t has become a grifter after all?

I have been writing a few blog posts about the youtuber who goes by the nickname Thunderf00t, who is one of the longest-active youtubers with a significant amount of subscribers, having been there since almost the very beginning of the platform, and still uploading videos semi-regularly. He became originally famous for his science content, particularly his videos debunking scam crowdfunding and other similar projects that promised physically impossible things. Then at some point, he became a notable anti-feminist, one of the first ones on the platform, and a very notorious one. He had a long beef with the part of the world-wide (although primarily American) atheist community that had been completely invaded and taken over by radical far-leftist activists set on aggressively pushing their leftist political agenda onto the atheist community. He still created videos on the topic of science and crowdfunding scams while doing that. However, at some point, for some reason, he suddenly became...

The problem of Big Brother style face recognition surveillance in the UK solved itself

Some years ago law enforcement in the United Kingdom, quite clearly having taken notes from the Chinese government, decided to install surveillance cameras in several cities that had automatic facial recognition software in them, to more easily find criminals. Unsurprisingly, and quite justly, a lot of people raised concerns about the question of privacy issues that this would create, and commented and protested on how this was once again just another step towards a totalitarian surveillance state, just like China. However, turns out that UK citizens had nothing to worry about because, very much unlike in China, in the UK the problem solved itself. Why? Well, consider the ethnicity of the majority of criminals identified by the automatic surveillance system. Do I even need to say more? (Indeed, the British government is now worried about "racial bias" and "racial profiling" that these automated systems are, unsurprisingly, engaging in.)

The most common misconception about Nelson Mandela

Nelson Mandela is most famous for being the South African leader who ended Apartheid and became the president of the country for five years. He is, in a way, also somewhat famous in an ancillary way for the so-called "Mandela effect", named after him, and that's the misconception that Mandela was imprisoned and died in prison, when in fact he lived for years after (and became the president of the country). However, that's not the misconception I'm talking about here. The misconception, by far and large more common than "he died in prison", is that he was a pacifist, and that he ended Apertheid and became the president of the country through extreme pacifism. This couldn't be farther from the truth. In actual reality Nelson Mandela was a violent Communist revolutionary who advocated for and associated with other violent revolutionaries, most of them staunch Communists (some of them, in fact, having moved there directly from the Soviet Union). In fact,...