What grinds my gears

If you have ever watched and followed the videogame speedrunning scene, you have probably seen it many times. While there are certainly exceptions, it's more the rule that whenever a speedrunner gets an extremely difficult world record in an extremely competitive speedrunning category of a popular game (and sometimes even when it's not so immensely popular nor competitive), they engage in an extreme over-reaction and start screaming like they are being murdered. And it's not even the more... let's say "effeminate" ones that are doing that. Almost all of them are doing that, with only few exceptions. I understand that when one has practiced and attempted a run of a particular game literally thousands and thousands of times, and the world record is  extremely  competitive and difficult, and when you are approaching the end at world record pace, heart rate and adrenaline skyrocket, and the speedrunner becomes extremely nervous and tense, and then actually achievi...

Recently a relatively random indie game was brought to the limelight because of a random and completely unnecessary piece of virtue-signaling within the game, in a scene where some kind of robot calls the female protagonist a "lass", and she retorts with "I'm a they, not a she" (even though the robot never uttered the word "she", but whatever). When people started digging a bit deeper, it turned out that this appears to be yet another " Concord "-like situation in many ways. While not identical, many details are very similar: Just like Concord, it was developed by a smallish indie game studio. And similarly to Concord, it took a whopping 7 years for the studio to develop the game (for Concord it was 8 years). The amount of content in the game is probably similar. It's not a game that should have taken 7 years to make by a competent team of developers. (I'm not at this moment aware of what the budget for the game was, but given a 7-per...

There have been numerous cases, all over the world, but most prominently in the United States, and most usually in casinos, where cops have wrongly arrested and charged completely innocent people based on a complete misconception that many cops (and sometimes other authorities) have. And that misconception is that machine facial recognition is extremely reliable and almost foolproof. Certainly more reliable than people's subjective estimations. Indeed, a lot of casinos in the United States (and sometimes some other establishments) have facial recognition software running that tries to detect people who have been banned from said casinos for one reason or another. When they ban someone, they take pictures, feed them to the software, and the software then uses facial recognition algorithms on all the live feed that they get from their hundreds of security cameras, and alerts the staff if there's a positive, ie. someone who has been banned potentially being back. The thing is, a l...

When the whole SKG movement started a year or two ago, the counter-arguments by the gaming industry were the same. Today, a couple of years and a huge amount of clarifications later the counter-arguments are still the same. It essentially boils down to: Gaming industry: "You can't force game publishers to keep their servers running forever." SKG: "Yes, and that's not what we are asking." Gaming industry: "But you can't force game publishers to keep their servers running forever." SKG: "Yes, agreed. You are correct. And that's why it's not what we are asking." Gaming industry: "But you can't force game publishers to keep their servers running forever." SKG: "AGREED! We are NOT asking for publishers to keep their servers running forever!" Gaming industry: "But you can't force game publishers to keep their servers running forever." SKG: "AGREED! YOU ARE CORRECT! WE ARE NOT, NOT, NOT, NOT...

Rupert Lowe, a member of the UK parliament, recently released the results of his team's investigation into the absolutely massive amount of abuse of underage girls in the country that has been going on for over two decades, with an estimated amount of victims of 250 thousand. And that's a  minimum  estimate, the ones that the authorities have records of. That's right. Not 250 victims. 250 THOUSAND victims. And that's the number of victims, not even the number of rapes. The number of rapes is probably in the millions, as many of these girls were abused for years and years. What's most shocking is that not only did law enforcement and social service workers not do anything about it even when directly reported by the victims themselves, in many cases they outright  helped the perpetrators . At some "safe houses" the staff literally provided children to the rapists, handing them over to them, fully knowing what the perpetrators were doing. In several cases whe...

Some time in 2019 an anonymous user in 4chan made this post, which got some popularity and has recently resurfaced and commented on by some youtubers: It defines the concept of "foundation myth" of a society, and posits that for all intents and purposes the second World War became such a thing for the modern west. It really is an insightful notion, as said war and, especially, the Holocaust, has indeed strongly shaped the western world and its policies, and it seems that it's almost always the underlying foundation and basis for many sociopolitical decisions that are made, as if it was our sacred duty to somehow keep "making amends" in one way or another because of it. As the post puts it, the Holocaust is for all intents and purposes considered sacred: You cannot mock it, you cannot doubt it, you cannot make light of it, you cannot dismiss it, you cannot consider it unimportant and irrelevant to modern sociopolitical decisions and how it shapes our society. Mon...

One thing that the modern far left just loves to do is wordplay: Change the meaning of words, misuse words, use words in (deliberately) confusing ways, and of course and most prominently, ban words and replace them with other words or invented neologisms. In many cases, while this wordplay is almost always completely idiotic, at least it makes  some  semblance of logic. Even if their arguments are wrong and idiotic, at least they can present the semblance of an argument or rationalization about why they are changing the meaning of a word, or banning it, or replacing it with a neologism. Sometimes these neologisms are outright dehumanizing and insulting, but at least there's some twisted logic behind them, some twisted rationalizations. However, sometimes there just aren't. Sometimes they just invent neologisms with no rhyme, reason, explanations or rationalizations. One that baffles me the most is something they have been using for a few years (and which, astonishingly, has ac...