What grinds my gears

Recently the National Museum of African American History and Culture released a display that reeks so much of white supremacy that it's absolutely incredible, attributing to "white culture" most things in society that pretty much anybody would agree are some of the best and most fundamental sociopolitical and scientific achievements of humanity. This is text that even most neo-nazi white supremacists would agree with, attributing these things exclusively to white people. It's almost incomprehensible how "woke" leftist academics would do this and say these things. But this is just the result of a decades-long brewing of a regressive leftist "social justice" "intersectional feminist" ideology in (mostly American) universities, by far-leftist neo-Marxist professors with nothing better to do than to come up with such astonishingly insane theories. This is not something that some deranged individual came up with and which, for some incompr

People have noticed that if you make a Google image search for "happy white american couple", the vast, vast majority of the results are images of black people. A few of the results may be of a white person with a black person. Rather obviously this is blatant bias, political activism and social engineering by Google! They are censoring white people and promoting black people in their stead! Or are they? When I was made aware of this and I checked that it is indeed the case, for some tens of seconds I was tempted to believe that indeed, this is quite blatant and egregious behavior by Google. Why are they doing this? Quite clearly this is political and racial bias. But then the rational part of my mind kicked in. Perhaps it's not that simple? I mean, I wouldn't put it past them to do this, given their history, but there's actually a completely rational reasonable explanation for these results. It may well be that it's inadvertent and accidental. How? Well, by f

Kotodama: The 7 Mysteries of Fujisawa is part visual novel, part "candy crush" like puzzle game where, in the puzzle sections, the more combos you get, the more clothes are ripped off of a young female character. This happens at a very minimum up to her wearing nothing but underwear. (I don't know if it goes beyond that, or if there's perhaps some kind of uncensored version where it goes beyond, because I haven't actually played the game.) There's nothing wrong in such a game. What's wrong is its PEGI age classification: PEGI 12. In other words, suitable for people as young as 12. My ass. Would you allow your 12-year-old son to play this game? Now, compare it to The Turing Test , which is a puzzle game played from the first-person perspective, similar in genre to the Portal series and The Talos Principle (but without being a ripoff of either one). There's nothing in this game that could be considered risqué, questionable or inappropriate to players

On June 18 I was morbidly curious about how the protests in the United States would affect coronavirus cases. After all, the extreme left only seems to care about the pandemic when it suits them. Well, I'll let the graph speak for itself: I think the answer is pretty clear.

Even though Marxist Communism, the kind that was implemented for about half a century in the Soviet Union, is the government system with the highest numbers of people killed for political reasons in the entire history of humanity, and regardless of all of its blatant violations of basic human rights, our western society has been successfully socially engineered in such a way that openly and blatantly Communist ideologues are not only teaching at universities and invited to speak in public events and live TV, but almost nobody even bats an eye anymore (even though in reality it should be treated with as much scorn as a blatantly Nazi ideologue would). One of their arguments that they love to present is that Communism protects worker's rights, while Capitalism exploits workers, who get pitiable sums while the CEOs and higher-ups get rich on their labor. The workers are pretty much in essence slave labor. The actual reality, however, is pretty much the exact opposite. In the Soviet Un

Recently in an elementary school in Florida an 8-year old had some kind of violent temper tantrum and the teacher called the police. For starters, any elementary school teacher who calls the police because she can't handle an 8-year-old is a mental retard that does not belong in a school teaching children, but in a mental hospital. That kind of mental retardation needs to be treated, and such a person must never be allowed anywhere near children. But that's not the worst part of it. The worst part is that not only did the police show up, but they frisked the 8-year-old boy, put him in handcuffs and took him away. An 8 years old boy. By two adult police officers. And this is not a unique case. It's not like in this one single instance the police officers happened to be hit by the same mental retardation as the teacher and started acting like complete lunatics. No, this very same thing has happened many, many times in the United States. It happens again and again. If here in

This is such an easy thing to predict that I'm almost tempted not to write a post about it because it seems so self-evidently true, but anyway. For four years now the regressive far-left in the United States, including all the major leftist news outlets and almost all of the Democratic Party, has been trying to push conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory about how the presidential election of 2016 was somehow rigged and meddled with by whatever foreign entity (Russia being the major but not only scapegoat) and whatever myriads of domestic entities. The big irony is that the far-left, including much of the Democratic Party, will try their hardest to meddle with, rig, sabotage and mess up the upcoming 2020 presidential election, using every possible legal and illegal trick they can think of. They have already tried to affect the 2020 election in the past by trying to get rid of the Electoral College. Their meddling will just escalate to astonishing levels towards the end of this

When you think about it, and if you have followed in any way what the modern "social justice" ideology posits and teaches, it has a surprising amount of agreement with bona fide racist white supremacy. For example: Both see everything in society and the world in terms of race. Moreover, both divide the entire population of the Earth into two groups: White people, and non-white people. Both think that there are inherent differences between these groups. Some of them (from both sides) may even posit that these differences are genetic , innate, in the very DNA of these people. Both think that given everything else being equal, if everybody were to be given the exact same opportunities and resources and everybody were treated exactly the same, white people will naturally raise to and take all the top positions in society, and non-white people would not be able to reach these positions. Both think that non-white people, especially black people, are incapable of succeeding in any

If there's one thing that the far-leftist social justice warriors love, is to have as many rhetorical, sociological and ideological weapons as possible to attack white people. One prominent example among many is the concept of "cultural appropriation". Which, rather obviously, is only applied to white people and nobody else. Only white people ever engage in "cultural appropriation". One particularly prominent example of this is the "dreadlocks" hair style, which some black SJW activists claim belong exclusively to black people and white people have no right to "appropriate" for themselves. This is one of those examples of "cultural appropriation" weapons that's being enforced with most aggressiveness and hostility, oftentimes even with physical assault (video evidence goes back quite many years). What makes this particularly egregious and ironic is that this is indeed a genuine example of cultural appropriation... but not by wh

It's a common trope in many sci-fi series (books and TV), typically the main plot in at least one episode, sometimes even the main plot of an entire book, that some kind of terrible weapon of mass destruction is discovered from a war between two peoples or civilizations that ended long before, and which has therefore become completely unnecessary, but which is now eg. headed towards the country/planet it was originally aimed at, and the main conflict of the episode is how to stop it, as the weapon has been constructed to make it nearly impossible to stop no matter what. Sometimes the weapon might in fact be so old that the original people or species who created it are long dead, or otherwise do not exist anymore (making the weapon all the more obsolete). Perhaps the weapon got into hibernation for decades or centuries for some reason and recently re-activated, or there was some other reason why its arrival at the destination was so delayed. The current revolution that the far-lefti

Some time ago some random black footballer in the United States started kneeling during the National Anthem that's played at the beginning of games, rather than standing up as is customary, as some kind of protest. This caused controversy because it was deemed disrespectful towards the National Anthem and the country (somehow this has become a thing in the United States). Well, this guy must feel really pleased with himself now, because everybody on the left is now kneeling during the National Anthem everywhere in the United States because of all this BLM stuff. Everybody is certainly following the leader here. The thing is, nobody can really explain what this gesture is supposed to mean. I don't think even this guy himself can explain what exactly he was trying to say with that gesture when he originally did it. The gesture itself is quite idiotic. That's because for pretty much almost as long as humanity has existed, kneeling before someone or some people has been seen as