Skip to main content

Once again: I blame female athletes for allowing male athletes to beat them

I have written about this very subject before, but I think it deserves repeating because male athletes invading women's sports and easily beating them just keeps happening again and again, and there seems to be no end to it.

In many instances some of the female athletes are not too scared into silence and acceptance and will actually dare to voice their grievances about the situation. Men are entering their competitions and robbing them of awards and qualifications for further next-level competitions. And these are usually male athletes who are mediocre in men's competitions. It's not like they are some of the top-of-the-world athletes who enter women's competitions and barely beat them. These are men who are mediocre in men's competitions, who go to women's competitions and beat them easily.

Quite tellingly, there is no similar problem in the other direction. There isn't even a single example of a female athlete entering a men's competition and easily beating them. Or finishing at any significant position. (Which just goes to show that the far-leftist narrative just doesn't hold water, no matter how vehemently they want to ignore this.)

Anyway, men are entering women's sports, and easily beating them and robbing them of their awards and qualifications. Who do I blame for this situation?

The female athletes themselves.

Yes, this is a blatant blaming-the-victim situation, but I do seriously believe that in this particular case it's warranted and justified.

Why?

Because the female athletes are allowing it to happen, even though they would have a very easy and effective way to combat it.

A very safe way of combating it. They wouldn't need to go in front of the cameras and millions of viewers to express their protest, putting their faces in the public and facing the ire of the far-leftist mob and mainstream media, potentially having their careers and even lives destroyed. They wouldn't need to organize any campaigns, they wouldn't need to participate in any interviews, they wouldn't need to put out any statements, they wouldn't need to face their opposition, they wouldn't need to risk being harassed and attacked by a mob of far-leftist terrorists (while the police just watches on the sidelines doing nothing about it).

And what is this very easy, effective and safe way in which they could combat this situation?

By doing nothing.

And I mean literally doing nothing. In other words, don't say anything, don't go anywhere, most crucially and importantly do not participate in the competitions where men are also participating. Just "catch the flu" or whatever. Nobody can force you to participate against your will. Get sick or whatever.

If there is a female sports competition where a man is participating, imagine if he is the only athlete participating. No other competitor appears. Imagine a stadium or hall full of spectators watching the event, and only one single athlete shows up for the competition. A male athlete.

It's likely that the competition would be cancelled and all the tickets would need to be refunded. It would be an absolute disaster, especially for the event organizers. The organizers would not put up with that for very long. Something would be done about it quite quickly.

This would be an extraordinarily effective way to protest the situation, which would quite quickly result in action from the organizers. And all the women would need to do is literally nothing. Very easy, very safe, very effective.

Yet, they don't do that. Instead, they go to the events, they participate against the male athlete, they get destroyed in the competition, and they just silently whine about it.

They would have this extraordinarily effective weapon against it, but they just refuse to use it.

That's why I blame the female athletes for the situation. If they refuse to do anything about it, even though they easily could, it's their own fault.

Comments