Skip to main content

Should leftist scientists be shunned?

Because modern far-leftism has successfully invaded pretty much all universities and all academia during the last 30-40 years, and consequently it has likewise succeeded in invading almost all of the scientific community, in many parts of the western world the ideology has made the scientific community to engage in extreme bigotry, discrimination, harassment and shunning of any scientists who do not conform to the ideology.

Many of them are literally advocating for all "conservative" scientists to be kicked out of all scientific institutions and for them to be shunned, discriminated against, and not allowed to have any platform of publication for their work, no matter what that work may be (even it said work is as removed from politics as it can possibly be.)

This got me thinking: Would it be good for science if this attitude was somehow reversed? In other words, if the scientific community started to do the same thing, but for the leftist activists within the community? Should the leftist bigots be thrown out of the community and completely shunned?

I think that if this were a realistic possibility, it should actually be seriously considered.

Why? Because of petty revenge? As a form of "take that!" and "have a taste your own medicine"?

No. The reason is much more rational than that. And that's that far-leftist activists, including scientists, have been conditioned and taught to lack objectivity and neutrality, which are some of the most important aspects of good science. During their entire academic careers, starting from university, they have been actively inculcated into a doctrine of activism, an ideology that actively abhors "neutral" and "objective" thinking and work. It's a doctrine that outright pushes and mandates its followers to do activism, to be everything but "neutral" and "objective". Not just in the sense of "it's good to be a political activist", but even going to be so far as saying that "not being a political activist is violence and makes you a fascist."

Indeed, the far-leftist ideology calls you a "fascist" and a "nazi" if you refuse to do leftist political activism and would just want to be completely objective and neutral. It deems that to be "violence".

This means that leftist scientists are outright unable to be unbiased and objective. They will try to inject their political activism into their research and publications whenever they can.

This skews scientific results and makes them unreliable. This research and these publications may contain highly biased and skewed results, which may throw off actual useful applications and knowledge.

In other words, these activist leftist scientist are not reliable. They have a personal political agenda that they have been taught to inject into everything. They literally can not be objective and neutral. It goes against their conditioning.

That's why they should be shunned from ever participating in science.

Comments