Recently in an online forum somebody linked to a Tweet thread where somebody discussed a potential copyright infringement against a friend of mine (also frequenting that forum). It was about the use of some screenshots of some videos that this friend had made. The tweet in question linked to my friend's website, to the content where the material from which the screenshots were taken from.
Anyway, the details of that are not really relevant here. The thing is, my friend's personal web page is full of all kinds of things, mostly related to programming, hobby projects and also contains a sort of personal diary and some opinion pieces on diverse subjects.
One of the people participating in that Twitter discussion thread dug up the titles of a couple of these opinion pieces (somewhere entirely elsewhere inside the website than the original point of the discussion) where he presented some criticism of the Islamic religion, and posted a screenshot of these article titles.
In this post he said that he was "saddened" that such a talented person could be so "horrible". He also said that he went ahead and found out what the Twitter account of my friend is, and blocked it. Another person responded to that tweet with a similar sentiment.
Note that my friend himself did not participate in this Twitter discussion, nor was his Twitter handle mentioned or visible anywhere. At no point had my friend made any Tweet or in any way interacted with this tweet thread or any of its participants in any way, shape or form. (In fact, he wasn't even aware of the existence of this before it was pointed out on that forum above.) Nevertheless, that person who posted the screenshots of the opinion piece titles had actively searched and researched what my friend's Twitter handle was, just for the mere purpose of blocking it pre-emptively.
Not very surprisingly, looking at that person's Twitter profile, as well as that other person who responded similarly, both of them had pronouns mentioned in their profiles.
If there's something positive about SJW indoctrination, it's that it makes their advocates to publicly give a warning about their indoctrination and personality in their Twitter profiles. Just look at somebody's Twitter profile, and if you see personal pronouns there (as their own isolated words), you know what kind of person you are dealing with, so it doesn't come as a surprise.
This is very typical behavior of indoctrinated SJWs, especially on Twitter: They are social media addicts, most often particularly Twitter addicts, and have been actively taught to build their own personal isolated bubbles, pre-emptively blocking anybody who they don't like, so that they don't have to see anything they have to say. The block lists of most Twitter SJWs are absolutely massive.
It's all part of the social justice cult indoctrination: Do not listen to outsiders, do not talk to outsiders, do not interact with outsiders, isolate yourself completely from outsiders, create your own little "safe space" where you don't have to see, hear or listen to any outsiders. Stop any dissenting ideas and opinions from even reaching you, and shield yourself against them. Preventively block anybody who could even potentially present an opinion that you don't like, even if you have never seen a single thing that person has ever said.
This is exactly what extreme religious cults do with their members. It's 100% a cult tactic.
Anyway, the details of that are not really relevant here. The thing is, my friend's personal web page is full of all kinds of things, mostly related to programming, hobby projects and also contains a sort of personal diary and some opinion pieces on diverse subjects.
One of the people participating in that Twitter discussion thread dug up the titles of a couple of these opinion pieces (somewhere entirely elsewhere inside the website than the original point of the discussion) where he presented some criticism of the Islamic religion, and posted a screenshot of these article titles.
In this post he said that he was "saddened" that such a talented person could be so "horrible". He also said that he went ahead and found out what the Twitter account of my friend is, and blocked it. Another person responded to that tweet with a similar sentiment.
Note that my friend himself did not participate in this Twitter discussion, nor was his Twitter handle mentioned or visible anywhere. At no point had my friend made any Tweet or in any way interacted with this tweet thread or any of its participants in any way, shape or form. (In fact, he wasn't even aware of the existence of this before it was pointed out on that forum above.) Nevertheless, that person who posted the screenshots of the opinion piece titles had actively searched and researched what my friend's Twitter handle was, just for the mere purpose of blocking it pre-emptively.
Not very surprisingly, looking at that person's Twitter profile, as well as that other person who responded similarly, both of them had pronouns mentioned in their profiles.
If there's something positive about SJW indoctrination, it's that it makes their advocates to publicly give a warning about their indoctrination and personality in their Twitter profiles. Just look at somebody's Twitter profile, and if you see personal pronouns there (as their own isolated words), you know what kind of person you are dealing with, so it doesn't come as a surprise.
This is very typical behavior of indoctrinated SJWs, especially on Twitter: They are social media addicts, most often particularly Twitter addicts, and have been actively taught to build their own personal isolated bubbles, pre-emptively blocking anybody who they don't like, so that they don't have to see anything they have to say. The block lists of most Twitter SJWs are absolutely massive.
It's all part of the social justice cult indoctrination: Do not listen to outsiders, do not talk to outsiders, do not interact with outsiders, isolate yourself completely from outsiders, create your own little "safe space" where you don't have to see, hear or listen to any outsiders. Stop any dissenting ideas and opinions from even reaching you, and shield yourself against them. Preventively block anybody who could even potentially present an opinion that you don't like, even if you have never seen a single thing that person has ever said.
This is exactly what extreme religious cults do with their members. It's 100% a cult tactic.
Comments
Post a Comment