Skip to main content

Why do social justice warriors want to change existing works of art?

For many years now the social justice ideology has tried to co-opt, invade and impermeate every aspect of society, and inject their political ideology into everything. This includes, of course, works of art and fiction.

However, rather than being content with creating their own original works of art, they want to take existing, long-established franchises, and change them to suit their political agenda. Most usually these changes are motivated and driven by both misandry and racism.

But what is the main motivation behind changing existing well-established franchises, changing them to conform to their politics, and co-opting them? There are many minor reasons for this (such as jealousy, and wanting to use art as a form of propaganda for social engineering), but there is one major reason.

The core underlying reason for this is an act of dominance and exerting their power. By taking away things from "white men", they are saying to them "this is not yours anymore, this is ours now". It's power-grabbing. It's a display of dominance. It's them who are in power now, and there's nothing you can do about it. It's the same as a school bully going to a new student and stealing his lunch, not because he wants the lunch (he may just throw it into the trash), but to show dominance. To establish the pecking order. To make the new student submissive. The bully, and the social justice warriors, get a rush when they can show their dominance over the "enemy". They get high on power. They feel smug. Expect ridicule and mockery to ensue, especially if the target of this bullying protests.

Comments