I have noticed how uncanny it is how closely controversial leftist agendas follow the traditional "stages of grief". These are some kind of activism agendas trying to enact or impose something radical and controversial on society, to try to achieve something, or something that happens deliberately or as a side-effect of far-leftist activism in society. When their critics try to point out the thing the left is trying to do, the left seems to go through the same steps as in "the five stages of grief":
1) Denial: "Of course it isn't happening! That's just a stupid right-wing conspiracy theory! It's complete misinformation! It's right-wing gas-lighting."
2) Anger: "How dare you claim that we are doing this?! You are just a racist misogynist fascist nazi right-wing extremist bigot! You are committing aggression against us by saying such things and making such accusations! You should be fired from your job and physically assaulted!"
3) Bargaining: "Ok, maybe it's happening, but it's actually a good thing! It's something desirable and something to celebrate! You should welcome it rather than oppose it! It's a benefit!"
4) Depression: This happens mainly if the opposition manages to fight back, even if temporarily. There will be lots of tears, lots of teary-eyed TikTok videos and Twitter posts with far-leftists crying how this is the worst possible thing, and how this is the end of the world, and how the concentration camps and ovens are just on the way.
5) Acceptance: Although, in this case, it's not them coming to accept the agenda. It's you! You will accept the agenda, whether by force, threats and intimidation into silence, or because of complacency. Like it or not, the leftist tactics work, and they do manage to change society permanently regardless of the opposition, and they have already succeeded in literally hundreds of such agendas, big and small, over the last 10-20 years, and many of these things have become completely commonplace and not even opposed anymore even by the very people who strongly opposed them in the past.
Comments
Post a Comment