Consider how eerily similar the European Union, especially Germany (which is, for all intents and purposes, the head of the EU), is to Nazi Germany.
The rhetoric is different in some details, and the tactics for pan-European (and eventually world) domination are different, but otherwise they are scaringly similar.
The National Socialist Worker's (ie. "Nazi") Party of Germany rose to power using the democratic process. It did so using several methods to convince the population to vote for them. Among these were the the idea that Germany needs a strong government to fix the economic and social problems that arose from a recent catastrophic events (namely, the first World War, and the economic reparations that Germany was subjected to for losing it). Another big tactic was inventing a scapegoat for all the problems in Germany: Namely, the Jews. The ultimate goal of the Nazi party was to "fix" Germany, make it a powerhouse, and ultimately make it an empire, by first conquering the entirety of Europe, and ultimately the rest of the world. When the Nazi party finally rose to absolute power in Germany, it pretty much bypassed the democratic process and created a totalitarian fascist regime that controlled every aspect of society, with an expansionist policy. It tried to implement this policy via military force.
The European Union, headed by (quite ironically) Germany, is eerily similar, even if the tactics and rhetoric is different in its details.
The European Union was created, and its representatives elected, through a democratic process. It used, and is actively using, several methods to convince the population for the need of its existence, and its grasp on power. Among these are the idea that the EU is needed to fix the problems that arose from recent catastrophic events (primarily the second World War, and the Holocaust). Another rhetoric being used very prominently, especially in recent years, is an invented scapegoat for all the problems in Europe: The "far right extremists". The ultimate goal of the EU is to create an European empire (not even my words, but words of EU representatives) which will be a powerhouse with great influence in the world. The EU is pretty much effectively bypassing the democratic process, as most of its executive power is held by unelected officials, and it enacting a totalitarian fascist regime that controls every aspect of society. Rather than use military force to achieve this (at least not yet), it's using a rather different tactic: That of population replacement. Instead of using military force to try to impose its power onto the entirety of Europe, it's instead bringing literally millions and millions of economic migrants to replace the native population.
The so-called "brown shirts" were a group of Nazi Party supporters in the late 1920's and early 1930's that would intimidate people using the threat of violence. They would disrupt events, they would threaten people, and they would use any means necessary to ensure that the Nazi Party would be elected and the only option for the people to elect. They would routinely inject themselves into events held by other parties and disrupt them, in order to make it impossible for competing politicians to get any support.
This is exactly what is happening nowadays as well.
Nazi propaganda in the press was non-stop. Propaganda against Jews was non-stop. The Nazi party made absolutely sure that people would hate Jews and vote for them to get rid of this "problem". This, once again, is eerily similar to how the leftist establishment operates, just replacing Jews with "right-wing extremists". They will classify anybody who opposes them and criticizes them as "extreme right", "nazis" and "nazi-sympathizers". This is no different form the Nazis calling their opponents "Jews" and "Jew-symphatizers".
The regressive left, and the European Union, are pretty much in essence the modern equivalent of the German Nazi Party, just using different rhetoric and different tactics.
The rhetoric is different in some details, and the tactics for pan-European (and eventually world) domination are different, but otherwise they are scaringly similar.
The National Socialist Worker's (ie. "Nazi") Party of Germany rose to power using the democratic process. It did so using several methods to convince the population to vote for them. Among these were the the idea that Germany needs a strong government to fix the economic and social problems that arose from a recent catastrophic events (namely, the first World War, and the economic reparations that Germany was subjected to for losing it). Another big tactic was inventing a scapegoat for all the problems in Germany: Namely, the Jews. The ultimate goal of the Nazi party was to "fix" Germany, make it a powerhouse, and ultimately make it an empire, by first conquering the entirety of Europe, and ultimately the rest of the world. When the Nazi party finally rose to absolute power in Germany, it pretty much bypassed the democratic process and created a totalitarian fascist regime that controlled every aspect of society, with an expansionist policy. It tried to implement this policy via military force.
The European Union, headed by (quite ironically) Germany, is eerily similar, even if the tactics and rhetoric is different in its details.
The European Union was created, and its representatives elected, through a democratic process. It used, and is actively using, several methods to convince the population for the need of its existence, and its grasp on power. Among these are the idea that the EU is needed to fix the problems that arose from recent catastrophic events (primarily the second World War, and the Holocaust). Another rhetoric being used very prominently, especially in recent years, is an invented scapegoat for all the problems in Europe: The "far right extremists". The ultimate goal of the EU is to create an European empire (not even my words, but words of EU representatives) which will be a powerhouse with great influence in the world. The EU is pretty much effectively bypassing the democratic process, as most of its executive power is held by unelected officials, and it enacting a totalitarian fascist regime that controls every aspect of society. Rather than use military force to achieve this (at least not yet), it's using a rather different tactic: That of population replacement. Instead of using military force to try to impose its power onto the entirety of Europe, it's instead bringing literally millions and millions of economic migrants to replace the native population.
The so-called "brown shirts" were a group of Nazi Party supporters in the late 1920's and early 1930's that would intimidate people using the threat of violence. They would disrupt events, they would threaten people, and they would use any means necessary to ensure that the Nazi Party would be elected and the only option for the people to elect. They would routinely inject themselves into events held by other parties and disrupt them, in order to make it impossible for competing politicians to get any support.
This is exactly what is happening nowadays as well.
Nazi propaganda in the press was non-stop. Propaganda against Jews was non-stop. The Nazi party made absolutely sure that people would hate Jews and vote for them to get rid of this "problem". This, once again, is eerily similar to how the leftist establishment operates, just replacing Jews with "right-wing extremists". They will classify anybody who opposes them and criticizes them as "extreme right", "nazis" and "nazi-sympathizers". This is no different form the Nazis calling their opponents "Jews" and "Jew-symphatizers".
The regressive left, and the European Union, are pretty much in essence the modern equivalent of the German Nazi Party, just using different rhetoric and different tactics.
Comments
Post a Comment