In a previous blog post about classical liberalism I mentioned the concepts of "positive rights" and "negative rights". What are they? Regardless of their misleading names, they do not stand for something like "good rights" and "bad rights". In this context "negative" means a right that forbids others (especially the government) from doing something to you ("do not do this"), while a "positive" right compels others (usually the government) to do something ("do this"). A negative right compels inactivity. A positive right compels activity. Freedom of speech is the quintessential example of a "negative right". This is because it forbids/stops others (primarily the government) from doing something to you, who has this right. More particularly, it forbids the government from punishing, deterring or silencing you because of your expression of opinion. This is not a "positive right" bec...