Skip to main content

"What is a woman?" demonstrates a culture of fear

In their ever-going quest to gain absolute power and control every aspect of society in a tyrannical oppressive totalitarian manner, the far left has tried and tested all kinds of concepts, narratives and tactics to advance this goal. Some have been less successful, and have been mostly forgotten by now, others have been enormously successful. Whenever they find a formula that seems to be really useful for this goal, they rabidly cling onto it and forcefully and very, very aggressively (oftentimes quite literally) try to push it onto society.

One of the most successful ones, one of the biggest and strongest weapons that they have found in order to achieve this goal of a total power-grab and takeover of society, is the "trans" activism ideology, which for the last few years has been pushed extremely hard and forcefully into society, using all the tactics in the book. They have pushed it so hard, and have been so successful in it, that you can find its poisonous tendrils pretty much everywhere, in every institution, organization, corporation, workplace and project that exists, at all possible levels, from the smallest and least significant of hobby group projects to the uppermost echelons of government in many Western countries. In several of these countries almost everything has been poisoned with the ideology, including law enforcement, the judicial system, the military, parliament, the different branches of government, and so on and so forth. (Ironically, and quite hilariously, the "trans" activists still claim to be "marginalized" and "oppressed" even though pretty much every single institution, including governmental and law enforcement institution, has been fully invaded by their ideology and is in full support. But this playing-the-victim is part of the tactic. They will keep doing it forever, no matter how much power they gain.)

One of the main tactics that they use in order to push the ideology is that of intimidation and fear: If you oppose, speak against, doubt or even so much as question the ideology, you will be punished with severe consequences. Your life may be completely ruined, you will be harassed and, in some cases (which are becoming more and more common), you may even be physically assaulted.

Many critics have noticed that, perhaps as a somewhat unintended side effect, this aggressive push for the (completely deliberate) confusion about sex and gender into society using fear and intimidation has caused a curious phenomenon amongst leftists who support the ideology: The vast majority of them seem to be unwilling to answer a very simple question: What is a "woman"?

Quite often when this question is posed to an unsuspecting leftist, the immediate response is hesitation. It's not puzzlement, or starting to think of a definition, or even ignorance. The answer is almost never something like "good question, let me think of a good definition", or "I have never thought of that", or even "I don't know". It's almost always hesitation. Visible and clear unwillingness to give a concrete precise answer. Either the person will outright refuse to answer (which is really common), or the non-answer will be very vacuous and vapid (usually in the form of circular reasoning like "a woman is someone who identifies as a woman", which is not a definition at all).

The reason why they are so unwilling to give a clear concrete definition is quite clear: They are afraid to do so.

They have been conditioned to be afraid of the severe consequences if they go against the leftist narrative, even by mistake. They know what happens if someone slips up and says something that the other people in the cult don't like, and they know it doesn't matter if it was said by mistake. They know that the consequences will be severe, and there will be no understanding nor forgiveness. If you become the target of the ire of your leftist peers, that's it. Your life will be ruined, and there's nothing you can do about it. In the worst case scenario you or even your family members may be harassed or even physically assaulted.

The entire ideology is based on intimidation and fear. It's being forced onto society by, essentially, terrorism: By making people afraid of going against the ideology, of presenting any form of dissent or any opinion that goes against the ideology, even if it's by accident. Even if you just slip up and say something "wrong" unintentionally, it doesn't matter: Your life could be ruined, just like that. Many far-leftists are absolutely terrified of the prospect, and couldn't dare to say anything even remotely "offensive" against the ideology. They have been conditioned, using intimidation and fear, into thinking that it's better to refuse to answer than take the risk of saying something "wrong".

When an ideology is based on intimidation and fear, when the main weapon that the ideology uses to gain traction is intimidation and fear, and severe consequences for anybody who goes against the ideology, when an ideology must silence all criticism by force and violence, you have to question how good that ideology is.

Comments