It's "unfair" if white people get to live in peace

That sentiment actually goes all the way back to the 1990's, especially in the leader of European multiculturalism, ie. Sweden.

Indeed, already in the 90's and early 2000's there were newspaper articles and opinion pieces written by leftist multiculturalist journalists (who were already a scourge especially in the Nordic countries back then) pretty much directly and unambiguously stating that it's unfair that some white people get to live in peace and quiet in their almost-100%-white rich neighborhoods and towns, and how the government should make plans on how to forcefully introduce immigrants into those places. (And, obviously, by "immigrant" they meant people from the Middle East and North Africa. Because for some reason those two areas have always been the "foreign enough" places all the way since the 90's. You never, ever saw them pushing for, say, Japanese or Canadians or Italians or even South Africans, particularly if white, to invade the country. It was always the Middle East and Northern/Central Africa for some reason.)

Indeed, several newspaper articles almost directly stated that, perhaps not explicitly using the word "unfair", but pretty much in essence that.

The one thing you never, ever, ever saw was any of these leftist journalists and activists stating the inverse, in other words, if there was an overwhelming-majority immigrant neighborhood (which there absolutely were in Sweden even in the 90's), that it was somehow "unfair" how they could live there without pretty much any white people. Obviously.

It has always been "white people = bad", all the way since the 1990's, and even earlier. Just the mere existence of a place, like a town, where there are only white people, is a bad thing. No explanations required. It just is, because it is. And it's particularly bad if said white-only town is extremely quiet, peaceful, happy, crime-free and prosperous. It's outright unfair!

The United Kingdom, the New Sweden of Europe (although countries like Germany are also fighting hard for that privileged position), has of course also adopted this very same mentality. For years now there have been newspaper articles about how bad and unfair it is that there are many places in the British countryside where there are "too many white people".

Why is it a bad thing? The articles don't explain. They don't need to explain. It just is, because that's the dogma, that's the doctrine, that's the catechism. It is true because it is, it doesn't need to be explained nor reasons given.

Unfortunately for the British people, particularly the people living in those peaceful towns and villages, the UK government has also been overtaken by these leftist activists, and thus they have been in recent years pushing hard to correct this horrendous problem.

And what do you know, town after town, village after village, parish after parish, places that had been extremely peaceful, quiet, safe, clean, crime-free and prosperous for literally centuries, have become the exact opposite. Noise is up, disturbances are up, crime is up, garbage and pollution of the landscape is up, peace is down, safety is down. In many places you can't even take a walk on the countryside in peace anymore, especially if a young woman or a child, but often not even if you are a big man.

Like with so many other similar things, the UK press and government are doing their hardest to fix the problem of peaceful, safe, quiet, clean majority-white places existing, which is obviously so unfair.

And notice that the UK government is not asking if the people living in the countryside want this. Their opinion on the matter literally does not matter. They are not asked anything. It will be done even if it happens against their will. It will be forced upon them.

The UK government has been betraying its own people for at least 20 years now. The UK government is guilty of treason, and that's not an exaggeration or hyperbole. It's about time to completely replace it.