Of course there are multiple such videos, but I recently encountered this one, where a trans activist is interviewed and asked questions about the subject, and the video encapsulates perfectly what they believe and, particularly, how dogmatically they believe it even against all evidence of the contrary.
For example, the trans activist presents the old tired claim that puberty blockers only "pause" puberty and their effects are fully reversible, that when the blockers are stopped, puberty then resumes and goes through its normal course.
When presented with the fact that puberty does not somehow magically just get paused and then continue normally, and instead puberty always stops at about 18 or so regardless of any blockers, and that boys who have been on puberty blockers during all that time end up with a permanent micro-penis, she just denies it, all she has to say is: "They probably want that."
(A bit irritatingly the interviewer doesn't press on that, ie. the contradictory claims.)
She obviously also presents the trans activist talking point that going on puberty blockers and hormones is a "choice" that the children make, and they can perfectly well give informed consent for that, and they are perfectly capable of understanding what it means... even though they don't have that same capability for anything else. Puberty blockers and hormones are the one exception to the rule. Why? Because. It just is. (When presented with the example that if a teenager suffers from anorexia the correct approach is not to just affirm it, she just answers with "it's not the same thing." Why? Because.)
And, of course, she mentions the alleged increased suicide rates among "trans" people who are not allowed to transition. When asked for any evidence or sources for this, she just says it's "based on facts", rather obviously cannot provide any sources for those "facts", and outright refuses to see any factual evidence of the contrary when offered. Instead, she just bails out when pressed too much to present those "facts" that she claims exist.
All of what she says is clearly based on dogma, not on actual facts. Every claim she makes she is making on principle and strong belief, not because there's any evidence backing it up. And quite notably, whenever presented with actual facts that contradict her beliefs, she just denies them, refuses to listen (quite literally and explicitly so at one point in the video) and just dodges.
That's the entire trans ideology in a nutshell, right there, summarized in a 9-minute video.
Comments
Post a Comment