"Jazza" is the nickname of a professional artist who makes YouTube videos. Recently he uploaded a video where he goes through pictures he drew as a young child. This is one of those pictures:
He comments in the video that the robot maid is "a bit misogynist".
This honestly leaves me completely perplexed. How is it "misogynist" in any way, shape or form?
For starters, it's a robot. The drawing isn't depicting a human being. It's not even a very human-looking robot, and instead looks like like those robots in old-school TV series from the 50's and 60's.
So, it's a robot maid. So what? What exactly makes it "misogynist". If it had been a "robot butler" would that have made it misandrist?
Maid services are offered to this day in most countries. They are completely normal. Just make a google search for "maid service" and google will probably tell the closest one to you. Is that somehow "misogynist"? I don't get it.
Or is the idea that the maid being a robot rather than a real person is somehow what's "misogynist" about it? What exactly is "misogynist" here? I just don't get it.
"Misogyny" in itself, as a term, refers to hatred, prejudice or discrimination against women, and most commonly refers to the ideology and attitude that some men have that women are somehow inferior in some ways, less capable, less smart, less stable, unreliable, acceptable targets of verbal (or even physical) abuse, and other such things.
How is drawing a robot maid some kind of prejudicial or discriminatory attitude towards women? Especially by a 7-year-old? (Once again, it's a robot. How can you be "misogynist" against a robot? A fictional one at that.)
This is just a brilliant example of how effective the modern feminist social engineering is: It makes a huge amount of people see "misogyny", "sexism", "racism" and all the other buzzwords in perfectly innocent and innocuous things. Moreover, it makes them see those things not only in others, but in themselves (which is part of the indoctrination). Even in things that they did as a child, which had exactly zero "misogynist" motivation behind them.
I'm pretty certain that if he had made this video something like 5 or 10 years ago, that idea of it being "a bit misogynist" wouldn't have even entered his mind. It would have been a completely bizarre idea that wouldn't even have registered.
He comments in the video that the robot maid is "a bit misogynist".
This honestly leaves me completely perplexed. How is it "misogynist" in any way, shape or form?
For starters, it's a robot. The drawing isn't depicting a human being. It's not even a very human-looking robot, and instead looks like like those robots in old-school TV series from the 50's and 60's.
So, it's a robot maid. So what? What exactly makes it "misogynist". If it had been a "robot butler" would that have made it misandrist?
Maid services are offered to this day in most countries. They are completely normal. Just make a google search for "maid service" and google will probably tell the closest one to you. Is that somehow "misogynist"? I don't get it.
Or is the idea that the maid being a robot rather than a real person is somehow what's "misogynist" about it? What exactly is "misogynist" here? I just don't get it.
"Misogyny" in itself, as a term, refers to hatred, prejudice or discrimination against women, and most commonly refers to the ideology and attitude that some men have that women are somehow inferior in some ways, less capable, less smart, less stable, unreliable, acceptable targets of verbal (or even physical) abuse, and other such things.
How is drawing a robot maid some kind of prejudicial or discriminatory attitude towards women? Especially by a 7-year-old? (Once again, it's a robot. How can you be "misogynist" against a robot? A fictional one at that.)
This is just a brilliant example of how effective the modern feminist social engineering is: It makes a huge amount of people see "misogyny", "sexism", "racism" and all the other buzzwords in perfectly innocent and innocuous things. Moreover, it makes them see those things not only in others, but in themselves (which is part of the indoctrination). Even in things that they did as a child, which had exactly zero "misogynist" motivation behind them.
I'm pretty certain that if he had made this video something like 5 or 10 years ago, that idea of it being "a bit misogynist" wouldn't have even entered his mind. It would have been a completely bizarre idea that wouldn't even have registered.
Comments
Post a Comment