Where do babies come from, progressive edition

The progressive social justice ideology is pushing really, really hard to indoctrinate children into that ideology from as early as possible. One big part of this program is, of course, sex education. It seeks to blur the lines between the sexes, and completely remove the notion of there being "boys" and "girls", "men", and "women". All those concepts must be removed from the newspeak language used around kindergarteners and schoolchildren. After all, we wouldn't want to inculcate gender stereotypes onto these blank slates that have no innate characteristics of their own, now would we?

One good example of this new social justice program is the book named "What makes a baby". There are many telling signs that this is a social justice edition of "where do babies come from?"

For starters, at no point in the entire book are the words "mother", "father" (in any of their forms), "boy", "girl", "man", or "woman" used.

Let me quote one of the pages:

"This is an egg. Not all bodies have eggs in them. Some do, and some do not."

Bodies. Not even "people". Bodies. This is what people have been reduced to. Bodies.

There's another page saying the same thing about sperm.

Moreover, the book completely obfuscates the fact of what kind of people have uteruses, completely disassociating it from the people who have "eggs":

"Just like eggs and just like sperm, some bodies have a uterus and some bodies do not."

This goes beyond blurring lines and obfuscating. It quite literally gives the impression that anybody can have a uterus, and this is completely unrelated to who produces eggs, and who produces sperm. The pictures of people in the book do not show any primary, secondary or tertiary gender traits at all, quite literally giving the impression that anybody can have a uterus, and it's implied that this is completely disassociated with whether a person is a "boy", or a "girl". The book in no way makes it clear that people who have uteruses produce eggs, and do not produce sperm. This goes beyond just "gender identity". This is blurring and obfuscating the lines of biology itself.

This is completely deliberate. They want to completely disassociate the concept of sex/gender with biological features. A "man" can have a "uterus", because it's enough for a woman to identify herself as a "man", and that settles it: We have a "man" with a uterus. Biology be damned.