Recently Donald Trump held a rally in Minnesota, and his supporters were harassed and even violently assaulted by left-wing terrorists.
In full view of the police, who refused to intervene, even when directly asked to do so.
These things do not happen in the Nordic Countries. Do you know why? Because here the police actually upholds the law. It's as simple as that. The police does not simply stand by, doing nothing, when a group of people is breaking the law by, for example, disrupting traffic, disturbing the peace, or harassing and assaulting people. Those things are illegal, and the police is efficient at upholding the law and stopping people from doing that.
Not so in most of the United States. While there are some cities in some states where the police is very "Nordic" in this regard, ie. they strongly enforce the law and quickly detain and arrest people breaking the law in front of them, in most of the rest of the United States, however, the police will simply watch from the sidelines while these terrorists are breaking the law, with complete impunity.
This is what, once again, happened at Minnesota. The police was watching people getting harassed and assaulted, traffic disrupted, and city property damaged, and actively refused to intervene. Several people were physically assaulted and hurt in direct view of the police, and they did nothing.
This is criminal activity by the police. It's failure of duty, failure to uphold the law, criminal negligence, and complicity in these criminal activities by willful and deliberate inaction. Those police officers are themselves breaking the law, and thus are criminals, which is especially abhorrent behavior from law enforcement officers.
The United States police forces are corrupt criminals, complicit in terrorist activity, harassment and assault.
When will these police officers be held accountable for their criminal activity? When will they be investigated, arrested, prosecuted and thrown in jail for their crimes?
When will the government officials who allow this to happen and refuse to demand the police forces to fulfill their duty, and to criminally prosecute these police officers, be themselves held accountable and investigated for their failure to protect the citizens from criminals and terrorism?
How far must the violence escalate before someone in government actually does something to stop it? When will enough be enough? How far will the terrorists be allowed to go before something is actually done to them? How far will the negligence of the law enforcement need to go before the government steps in and prosecutes these corrupt police officers for failure of duty and complicity in these terrorist activities?
In full view of the police, who refused to intervene, even when directly asked to do so.
These things do not happen in the Nordic Countries. Do you know why? Because here the police actually upholds the law. It's as simple as that. The police does not simply stand by, doing nothing, when a group of people is breaking the law by, for example, disrupting traffic, disturbing the peace, or harassing and assaulting people. Those things are illegal, and the police is efficient at upholding the law and stopping people from doing that.
Not so in most of the United States. While there are some cities in some states where the police is very "Nordic" in this regard, ie. they strongly enforce the law and quickly detain and arrest people breaking the law in front of them, in most of the rest of the United States, however, the police will simply watch from the sidelines while these terrorists are breaking the law, with complete impunity.
This is what, once again, happened at Minnesota. The police was watching people getting harassed and assaulted, traffic disrupted, and city property damaged, and actively refused to intervene. Several people were physically assaulted and hurt in direct view of the police, and they did nothing.
This is criminal activity by the police. It's failure of duty, failure to uphold the law, criminal negligence, and complicity in these criminal activities by willful and deliberate inaction. Those police officers are themselves breaking the law, and thus are criminals, which is especially abhorrent behavior from law enforcement officers.
The United States police forces are corrupt criminals, complicit in terrorist activity, harassment and assault.
When will these police officers be held accountable for their criminal activity? When will they be investigated, arrested, prosecuted and thrown in jail for their crimes?
When will the government officials who allow this to happen and refuse to demand the police forces to fulfill their duty, and to criminally prosecute these police officers, be themselves held accountable and investigated for their failure to protect the citizens from criminals and terrorism?
How far must the violence escalate before someone in government actually does something to stop it? When will enough be enough? How far will the terrorists be allowed to go before something is actually done to them? How far will the negligence of the law enforcement need to go before the government steps in and prosecutes these corrupt police officers for failure of duty and complicity in these terrorist activities?
It's the same in Oregon, where the police chief and mayor cater to Antifa because it gets them votes. Both it and Oregon are often more radical than the states you would expect, such as California.
ReplyDeleteThe county (the district attorney, i.e. prosecutor) and state governments (the legislators) above the cities are also captured by politicians catering to these groups, so it's effectively "legal" for them to do illegal things.
And because regulation of the public safety is a power reserved to the states, the federal government has no power to compel compliance. Thus, only the ways to change things are a court order from a private lawsuit or voters electing different county/state officials.
The United States Constitution grants Congress the right to military intervention in cases of rebellion and insurrection, and if a state succumbs to lawlessness and refuses to enforce law and order and to protect the safety of its own citizens, I think this constitutes such.
Delete