Many commentators and critics of the modern regressive leftist ideology sometimes allude to the custom of judging people, especially historic people (eg. from hundreds of years ago) based on modern moral standards, as if those people were as guilty of those moral atrocities as they would be if they lived today and did those things today. This is often unjustified and unjust because the moral standards were different back in those days. But what does that mean? It's easy to misunderstand this sentiment. Does this mean that the dubious moral acts that those people did eg. 200 years ago were not abhorrent simply because people didn't think of it being abhorrent? Is injustice against and oppression of people dependent on what the culture of the era happens to think of it? No, that's not what the criticism is saying. The criticism is not saying "those acts were ok 200 years ago, even though they are not ok today." What the criticism is saying "we shouldn...